Public says more legislation of cyclists needed to save lives
Like it or not, cycling is a political issue. While the industry would always back zero fatalities in accidents involving cyclists and LGVs, the cycling lobby has campaigned for increasing use of mirrors, sensors and cameras in and out of the cab – creating a perception that the industry doesn’t take its safety requirements seriously.
Yet the industry would argue that it has never had a better safety record, never been more compliant, and never been better trained – thanks to measures such as the Driver CPC.
No training or insurance
CM’s letters page is often full of drivers complaining that it is mad to fill roads with vulnerable road users with little or no training, with no insurance, and who pay no additional tax. For some in the cycling lobby, the panacea is training: the London Cycling Campaign, for example, wants all London councils to offer cycle awareness training to all drivers for council-run vehicles and subcontractors. It said that training is required to “better understand the vulnerability of people who cycle” .
Equally, the government has set an agenda to promote cycling for health and environmental reasons. Only last week, London Councils said 47% of Londoners would cycle more if road safety was improved.
However, a survey of more than 2,000 British adults found there is lots of support for increased legislation for cyclists to reduce the number of accidents among cyclists on the road.
More than a third of the public wants to see compulsory helmets for cyclists (38%), even though the Royal College of Surgeons has said they are not justified in terms of health and safety and are likely to reduce the number of people who cycle. Another 36% of those surveyed would support a ban on cyclists wearing headphones. Equally, a third wants greater fines for cyclists who disobey the rules of the road (33%).
Is education the way forward?
Surprisingly, 30% of the 2,049 adults surveyed by ComRes on behalf of CM supported compulsory lessons on road safety for cyclists, while only 19% supported better education among car drivers and 13% for truck drivers.
Only 7% of those surveyed thought there should be more cycle-safety devices fitted to vehicles.
All those surveyed could supply three answers.
- Survey conducted by ComRes between 26 and 28 July, interviewing 2,049 British adults. Data is weighted to be representative of all British adults aged over 18.
Learn more about cycle safety at a CM Live seminar, hosted by industry experts.
Director disqualified for £190,000 debt
A haulage boss from Northern Ireland has been disqualified from being a company director for seven years after his firm went out of business owing more than £190,000 to creditors.
Stephen Rogan, 48, of Nutt’s Corner, Crumlin, Co Antrim, was barred by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment after it investigated the conduct of his firm SR Transport (NI), which went into liquidation in December 2010 with an estimated total deficiency to creditors of £193,722. The investigation revealed that Rogan had failed to pay more than £150,000 owed to HMRC. This consisted of £23,580 in PAYE contributions, £30,453 in national insurance contributions and £96,778 relating to VAT for the years 2008/09, 2009/10 and 2010/11.
According to the department, these actions helped the firm trade while insolvent. In addition, SR Transport (NI) owed HMRC a total of £17,293 in corporation tax for the years 2007/08 and 2008/09. Rogan broke company law rules by taking out a loan from the firm - at least £105,000 of which remained unpaid at the date of liquidation. He also allowed 33 cheques totalling £27,000 to bounce.
The liquidator said Rogan had not fully co-operated with its requests for information, and his company failed to file annual returns for the years 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 within the prescribed period. It failed to file an annual return for 2010 at all. Rogan also submitted an inaccurate statement of affairs about SR Transport (NI).